Thursday, March 17, 2016
Thursday, June 5, 2014
The link above from a couple part-time in Princeville is about the naturist history of Secret Beach.
The name of the "enforcer", or as I prefer, "vigilante", was Sakae Takenaka. Takenaka was employed by the Kauapea Homeowners Association, a domestic entity created by land owner Michele Hughes. Takenaka was paid $15. per hour to ostensibly be a maintenance man, according to his employment contract obtained by Kauai Naturists. In actual fact, for years he walked the length of Secret Beach and harassed, and invaded the privacy of gay, naturist, and "hippy" beach goers. Of course, all three groups have legal protections in Hawaii. Hughes had to auction off her parcels above Secret Beach which she operated for years with impunity as illegal vacation rentals. Just before she auctioned off, she went to the Kauai County Planning Commission and got permits to magically make them legal. Good riddance to her.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
On December 1, 2012 officers of the Kauai Police Department were present at Lepeuli to make sure the illegal fencing was not interrupted. A marked police car was parked in the county-owned public parking lot and another marked police car on Koolau Road where a uniformed officer was observed speaking with Bruce Laymon, who was seated in a gray jeep.
KPD officers and Laymon were on the beach at one point harassing a couple down on their luck who were camping there. Laymon told them since their tarp was tied to a tree growing out of the sand they were tresspassing on private property. This is false as the vegetation line is not the legal definition of the seashore in Hawaii anymore. The highest wash of the waves in the highest wave season (winter) excluding named storms and tsunamis is the shoreline. The husband was threatened with arrest if he did not leave the public property beach!
Meanwhile up on the trail, KPD officers stood by while the SMA permit was again violated instead of stopping the violation. A metal pole was installed in the center of the pedestrian trail and new barbed wire was placed on wooden posts on either side of the entrance to the trail from the parking lot. What authority does a lessee of private property have to make improvements to a public, county-owned beach access????? Does the lessee have a permit to make access to the public property at Lepeuli in addition to the Waioli Corporation property???? Until a beachgoer complained, an excavator was parked directly in front of the trail entrance from the parking lot Saturday morning, blocking public access. A young male was present in the public parking lot with a bull whip. Why??? The dangerous barbed wire and metal pole as of today December 18, 2012 have disappeared. I made a complaint to Mary Daubert of the Office of the Mayor about the barbed wire. The metal pole obstructing access went away right before a field trip to Larsen's Beach by the Open Space Commission, a volunteer commission that takes public suggestions for public access.
I filed a complaint with the Kauai Police Commission on December 10th regarding the involvement of KPD in this matter. The matter is scheduled as a public hearing agenda item for Friday, December 28, 2012 at 9 AM in the usual public meeting room at the Lihue Civic Center a couple of doors down from planning and the driver license office. Questions to be raised include did the police chief know about this prior to it taking place. I want to know who paid for this detail and how much it cost. Who paid, the taxpayers, Waioli Corporation, Paradise Ranch, or perhaps Patricia Hanwright, the adjoining property owner in the ahupua'a of Kaakaaniu who denies a historic ala loa trail exists on her property just as Waioli denies it exists on theirs. I ask those of you who care about clean, open government and beach access to attend and ask tough questions. You may also submit brief, polite to the point testimony to the Kauai Police Commission to the attention of Mercedes Youn at firstname.lastname@example.org. Please submit two days before the meeting.
Not the least to be asked is why beachgoers on Saturday December 1, 2012 observed multiple trucks with guys standing on the beds of their pick up trucks holding long armed firearms (shotguns and /or rifles). One such vehicle was even parked on the dirt county-owned beach access road. Pig hunting is not done at 3 in the afternoon within a few hundred feet of a public roadway. Aside from hunting, I am unaware of the police chief of any Hawaiian county issuing permits for carrying in public of firearms. Those of you who have applied for a permit to carry understand this well. This is clearly intimidation of the public by thugs with KPD support trying in vain to stop public access to the public property beach.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
... most of my townsmen would fain walk sometimes, as I do, but they cannot. No wealth can buy the requisite leisure, freedom, and independence which are the capital in this profession. ... I know very well that they have confined themselves to the highway ever since ... the walking of which I speak has nothing in it akin to taking exercise, ... but is itself the enterprise and adventure of the day. ...Moreover, you must walk like a camel, which is said to be the only beast which ruminates when walking. When a traveler asked Wordsworth's servant to show him her master's study, she answered, "Here is his library, but his study is out of doors." ...When we walk, we naturally go to the fields and woods: what would become of us, if we walked only in a garden or a mall? ...There are square miles in my vicinity which have no inhabitant. From many a hill I can see civilization and the abodes of man afar. The farmers and their works are scarcely more obvious than woodchucks and their burrows. Man and his affairs, church and state and school, trade and commerce, and manufactures and agriculture even politics, the most alarming of them all--I am pleased to see how little space they occupy in the landscape...At present, in this vicinity, the best part of the land is not private property; the landscape is not owned, and the walker enjoys comparative freedom. But possibly the day will come when it will be partitioned off into so-called pleasure-grounds, in which a few will take a narrow and exclusive pleasure only--when fences shall be multiplied, and man-traps and other engines invented to confine men to the public road, and walking over the surface of God's earth shall be construed to mean trespassing on some gentleman's grounds. To enjoy a thing exclusively is commonly to exclude yourself from the true enjoyment of it. Let us improve our opportunities, then, before the evil days come.
Saturday, September 24, 2011
(Photo above: fisherfolk camping in state Conservation District at Lepeuli Beach Sept. 16, 2011. Vehicles access beach via permission of landowner Waioli Corporation and/or their lessee Bruce Laymon through Waioli property.)
Obtaining enforcement from the Kauai County Planning Commission and the state Department of Land and Natural Resources Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands to order the illegal fencing at Lepeuli removed would be made much easier if the Kauai County Planning Director at the time that granted Paradise Ranch the SMA Permit, Ian Costa, had required a current Shoreline Certification survey done for Lepeuli as a condition of the SMA permit. The most recent one is the link below, from 1978.
State and county planning regulators understandably wish to know with precision where one area of responsibility begins and ends. The Kauai County Planning Department, in Lepeuli, has responsibilty for the SMA Area, which for purposes of this explanation, runs from 300 feet mauka of the shoreline inland to a certain point. The state enforces its Conservation District regulations from that 300 foot line seaward (makai). So, obviously, all involved need to know where 300 feet from the shoreline is in Lepeuli.
In February 2011 the local chapter of the Sierra Club requested the state Land Use Commission, LUC, to create a Boundary Interpretation document for Lepeuli so we could know exactly where this boundary line is. To do this the LUC could have made a site visit or relied on a survey map and mark the boundary on it. Only the state can do that with certainty, not a private surveyor. They took the survey created by Alan Hirnaka and placed their boundary upon it. The only shoreline data available was from the 1978 survey. The LUC issued the Boundary Interpretation June 25, 2011. Click the link below to view it.
They determined the boundary seperating the Conservation District area from the SMA Area was significantly more mauka than where surveyor Hiranaka placed it. The practical result is that the lateral, coastal trail is, according to the Land Use Commission, entirely within state, not county, jurisdiction, as is a significant amount, but not all, of the fencing installed May 21, 2011. Since there has been erosion at this location since 1978, any boundary line based on current shoreline data would be even more mauka.
This conflicts directly with the statement of Les Milnes, a Kauai County Planner, who stated in a Field Investigation Report dated May 25, 2011 "The installed ag field fencing is mauka (inland) of Cons./Ag district line as sighted by surveyor on 1/20/11." The county position is that ALL fencing installed May 21, 2011 is county responsibility and is in the SMA Area in the Agricultural District.
After the Boundary Interpretation was issued and distributed to those who requested it, it was rescinded on the grounds that a current (within one year) Certified Shoreline survey did not accompany the request. The Boundary Interpretation was stamped with the endorsement
"APPROXIMATE STATE LAND USE AGRICULTURAL/CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOUNDARY (FOLLOWS 300 FT. SETBACK AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VALID CERTIFIED SHORELINE SURVEY)"
We have a situation in Hawaii where only the landowner can request a Certified Shoreline survey. And a Certified Shoreline is needed for a valid Boundary Interpretation. So, what if an island planning department waives the requirement for such a survey? What if the landowner refuses to get such a survey, as is the case here in Lepeuli? The mess we have today is the result. In 2012 the legislature is going to be asked to correct this loophole. The shoreline belongs to the PEOPLE, not private landowners. It only seems logical the People should be able to have it surveyed if need requires. And here in Lepeuli is an obvious need.
Friday, September 9, 2011
Above: Dead bird. Probably killed by an unleashed dog. Below images show fencing blocking end of trail. Fences erected under authority of Patricia Hanwright, owner of three parcels of land in Kaakaaniu ahupua'a.
§115-9 Obstructing access to public property; penalty. [Repeal and reenactment on June 30, 2013. L 2010, c 160, §7.] (a) A person commits the offense of obstructing access to public property if the person, by action or by having installed a physical impediment, intentionally prevents a member of the public from traversing:
(1) A public right-of-way;
(2) A transit area;
(3) A public transit corridor; or
(4) A beach transit corridor;
and thereby obstructs access to and along the sea, the shoreline, or any inland public recreational area.
(b) Physical impediments that may prevent traversing include but are not limited to the following:
(4) Constructed barriers;
(6) Security guards;
(7) Guard dogs or animals; and
(8) A landowner's human-induced, enhanced, or unmaintained vegetation that interferes or encroaches within beach transit corridors.
(c) Obstructing access to public property is a misdemeanor.
(d) Minimum fines for violation under this section shall be as follows:
(1) $1,000 for a second conviction; and
(2) $2,000 for any conviction after a second conviction.
(e) As used in this section:
"Landowner" means the record owner of the property or the record owner's agent, including a lessee, tenant, property manager, or trustee.
"Person" means a natural person or a legal entity.
"Public recreational area" means public lands or bodies of water opened to the public for recreational use. [L 2004, c 169, §2; am L 2010, c 160, §4]
In Hawaii, people have the right to access the beach and ocean. Hawaiian Kingdom laws, Territorial Laws, and State Laws today (as above) all guarantee this right. Private landowners, from the mainland mostly, especially those holding choice coastal parcels, value their privacy and many have a sense of entitlement that by virtue of their birth, status, wealth, who they know, or geneology, they seek to push upon the community. Who was it that said laws are for the "little people"?
The fencing in these photos is illegal as Patricia Hanwright never obtained a state Conservation District Use Permit (CDUP) to install the fencing. The fencing depicted above at the Moloaa-Kaakaaniu boundary, also needed a Conservation District Use Permit for construction. However, that violation is more serious as it actually cuts off pedestrian access according to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS). Patricia Hanwright is well aware of where the state Conservation District Boundary line is on her properties in Kaakaaniu, as a Shoreline Certification was performed by surveyor Dennis Hashimoto and signed by the Chairperson of the state Department of Land and Natural Resources May 7, 1992. This document (above, click to enlarge) shows the Conservation boundary line at 300 feet mauka of the shoreline. My photographic evidence depicts both sets of Kaakaaniu fencing within 300 feet of the shoreline. Patricia Hanwright is clearly in violation.
In 2011 Patricia Hanwright apparently engaged the services of a surveyor again. Survey stakes were observed marking her property line at the Lepeuli end of Kaakaaniu. A vandal subsequently removed many of her stakes, and she contacted the Kauai Police Department and filed a complaint. The police report of that complaint is at the link below. Kauai Naturists opposes the use of illegal behavior to protest the illegal acts of others. We encourage legal means such as letter writing, petitions, hearings, lawsuits etc. to achieve these ends. We certainly do urge all members of the community to speak up for what is right, but not to break the law.
The link above describes the legal procedure for how the State of Hawaii obtains historic trails. This is from the website of the Na Ala Hele Trails Program, a part of the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife.
The link below is a list of the members of the newly-reactivated Kauai Na Ala Hele Trail Advisory Council.
Contributed by Richard Spacer.